Prosecutors appeal dismissed charge in Bennington sex case

They say assault stemmed from defendant's lying about his STD

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.  

BENNINGTON — In November 2018, a woman said Robert Billington had sex with her multiple times without saying he was HIV-positive. In one instance, she reportedly asked the Bennington man if he had a sexually transmitted disease, and he said "no."

State prosecutors are now asking the Vermont Supreme Court to reinstate Billington's charge of repeated aggravated sexual assault, saying the woman wouldn't have agreed to sex if she had known Billington had HIV.

According to Vermont State Police, the woman became suspicious that Billington had an STD when he wanted to use a condom the first time they had sex. She told investigators she confronted him about it, but he denied having an STD.

Judge John Valente, of the Superior Court in Bennington County, earlier dismissed the felony charge after Billington's attorneys said his alleged actions were not a crime under state law.

Bennington County Deputy State's Attorney Alex Burke argues that Billington, 35, committed the crime when he "repeatedly lied to her about his HIV status, thus making the sexual encounter nonconsensual," according to the brief he submitted to the Supreme Court.

"The victim never agreed to have sex with a man who was HIV positive," Burke wrote.

Article Continues After Advertisement

He cited case precedent in which the Vermont Supreme Court found that "there is no consent when consent is based on fraud," though the prosecutor acknowledged the cases did not directly address sexual acts.

Billington's attorneys, on the other hand, said there is no provision in Vermont's criminal or public health laws that criminalizes a person's failure to disclose his HIV status before he engages in sex.

Article Continues After These Ads

Public defender Dawn Matthews, who is representing Billington before the High Court, said Judge Valente determined that if the state legislature wanted to criminalize sexual conduct based on non-disclosure of a person's HIV status, "it would have said so explicitly."

Alternatively, Matthews said in her brief, the legislature could have made such withholding of STD information a misdemeanor, as it did with gonorrhea and syphilis.

"That it did not do so should end this matter," she wrote, emphasizing that it is lawmakers — and not the Court — that should legislate the issue.

The state Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case May 14, which was streamed live on the Vermont Courts' YouTube channel.

Article Continues After Advertisement

While Billington's prosecution is ongoing, he is detained at Southern State Correctional Facility in Springfield, according to Vermont's inmate database online.

He currently has two pending felony charges: sexual assault with no consent, as well as lewd and lascivious conduct. Both are based on a sexual act he is alleged to have forced on the same woman, and do not touch on his HIV status, according to court documents.

Billington was tried on the two charges last August, but a jury couldn't reach a unanimous verdict. The state sought to retry him and added a third charge of repeated aggravated sexual assault — the most serious of the charges, carrying a potential penalty of 10 years to life in prison.

Vermont Associate Justice William Cohen, who presided over Billington's trial while he was a Superior Court judge, has recused himself from the Supreme Court appeal.

Contact Tiffany Tan at or @tiffgtan on Facebook and Twitter.


If you'd like to leave a comment (or a tip or a question) about this story with the editors, please email us. We also welcome letters to the editor for publication; you can do that by filling out our letters form and submitting it to the newsroom.

Powered by Creative Circle Media Solutions