Court decision should be final answer to census question
U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman last week did not find that Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross tried to manipulate the census to discourage immigrants from taking part. He did not document that Ross's motive was to tilt the count in favor of Republican-leaning states so they would get more representation in Congress. He did not have to. He simply enumerated the myriad ways Ross violated the law and made clear that Ross had no legitimate explanation for his hasty, sloppy meddling in the census. All of which was more than enough reason for the judge to order the commerce secretary to stop.
The dispute before Furman centered on Ross's decision to add a question about citizenship to 2020 census forms, a move that common sense suggests would lead fewer people, particularly those scared of a Trump-era, anti-immigrant backlash, to return their questionnaires. It turns out that common sense is well-grounded in facts.
The Constitution requires a census every 10 years of every person, citizen and noncitizen, residing in the United States. Even small biases in the data can produce big shifts in policy and representation. With the stakes so high, Congress unsurprisingly forbade the commerce secretary from adding a question to census forms if the desired information could be gathered in some other way. In this case, citizenship information can indeed be gathered from existing administrative records. In fact, adding a question would make the data less accurate than simply relying on other records, as nonresponses piled up and as noncitizen respondents lied about their status.
Census experts figured that adding the citizenship question would cut response rates among noncitizens by 5.1 percent. A lower response rate would mean Census Bureau officials would have to follow up in person, perhaps several times, to gather information on a given household. If that did not work, the bureau would have to impute demographic information to fill the gaps in its data. The extra work would cost the government at least $27.5 million. And for all this effort and risk to the integrity of the count, the government would get nothing of value.
"In a startling number of ways," Furman declared, "Secretary Ross's explanations for his decision were unsupported by, or even counter to, the evidence." The commerce secretary claimed he was simply responding to a request from the Justice Department for more information on the voting-eligible population, so as to better enforce voting-rights laws. In fact, the record shows that he wanted to add the question well-before the Justice Department requested it, and he and his staff searched for help from other agencies to gin up an excuse.
The Trump administration is likely to appeal. But after Furman's comprehensive, unassailable, 277-page drubbing, it would be astonishing if any judge allowed Ross to proceed.
— The Washington Post
TALK TO US
If you'd like to leave a comment (or a tip or a question) about this story with the editors, please email us. We also welcome letters to the editor for publication; you can do that by filling out our letters form and submitting it to the newsroom.