Pew report recommends that Vermont increase reserve funds to 8 percent


A study released Tuesday suggests the state of Vermont should change the way it manages reserve funds.

Vermont is among the top five U.S. states in revenue volatility for the period of 1994-2012, according to a report by The Pew Charitable Trusts titled "Building State Rainy Day Funds."

Vermont's Rainy Day Fund is fueled by surplus revenue and is not tied to fluctuations in tax receipts. The state frequently taps the fund to pay for unanticipated expenses that are part of the mid-year annual budget adjustment legislation each January.

The state also has a Tax Stabilization Reserve, which is pegged at 5 percent of the previous year's expenditures. Pew analyzed the state's Rainy Day Fund and stabilization fund combined. Vermont has roughly $67 million in the two funds.

The states with the highest rates of volatility (Alaska, North Dakota, Wyoming and Vermont), according to the report, are those that depend heavily on one or two major sources of revenue.

For Vermont, the main source of revenue is the personal income tax, which is subject to fluctuation.

The Pew report makes three major recommendations that would help states prepare for unanticipated deficits. Vermont officials say they are already addressing several of these areas.

The report says states should:

  • Conduct regular studies to identify changes in the economy that affect tax revenue;
  • Tie Rainy Day funding to unexpected windfalls or spikes in revenue growth so that states put more aside during good times;
  • Adjust the size (or cap) of the reserve fund to match trends in budget shortfalls.

The study shows the state's set-aside funds should be closer to 8 percent or 10 percent in many cases.

Steve Klein, chief fiscal officer for the Legislature's Joint Fiscal Office, said Tuesday the Pew report characterized Vermont's reserve policies fairly but did not include recently enacted changes.

Lawmakers last session placed a 50 percent cap on the amount of Rainy Day Funds from the previous fiscal year that can be used to fund emergency shortfalls. It also requires that money be added to the Rainy Day Fund if revenue falls 2 percent or more below projections.

"I think we're doing the right things in Vermont," Klein said. "We've taken some of the steps that (the report) called for, but we could do more."


If you'd like to leave a comment (or a tip or a question) about this story with the editors, please email us. We also welcome letters to the editor for publication; you can do that by filling out our letters form and submitting it to the newsroom.

Powered by Creative Circle Media Solutions