Gun control, the U.N., and Obama
Welcome to President Obama’s second term, America -- that special place where ridiculousness replaces raison d’etre, and presidents give us things like gun control a’ la United Nations.
Obviously, Obama understood he would never get the support needed for a gun control bill from Congress, so the astute constitutional professor chose to skirt around the Constitution by signing on to the United Nations (U.N.) Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) shortly after his re-election. Liberals certainly know how to get what they want, ethics aside.
Remember in 2010, when former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi described how liberals would circumvent the electorate to pass Obamacare? Pelosi said they would "... go through the gate. If the gate’s closed, we’ll go over the fence. If the fence is too high, we’ll pole vault in. If that doesn’t work, we’ll parachute in." And parachute they did.
Now Obama’s doing the same thing with gun control. On one hand, we have the administration telling us they are committed to protecting our Second Amendment rights; while on the other hand, the president is joining alliances with U.N. gun grabbers by giving them the green light for the ATT. In the real world, presidents work in conjunction with Congress to pass laws, but in Obama Land anything goes.
The administration claims ATT primarily applies to exporting weapons, thus posing zero threat to gun ownership domestically. ATT’s verbiage, instructing nations to "take the necessary legislative and administrative measure to adapt, as necessary, national laws and regulations to implement the obligations of this treaty, is too gray, hence leaving room to dilute or supersede the Second Amendment.
It is clear Obama’s been a gun control advocate all along, although he was too cowardly to admit it before re-election. According to the Washington Post, last year Obama told gun control activist Sarah Brady, whose husband Jim was shot during the Reagan assassination attempt in 1981, that gun control was "very much on his agenda ... but under the radar."
History will not be kind to America’s 44th president who promised transparency, but governed mostly under the radar.
Of course, the U.N. wants us to believe that global gun control is for our own good and granting them authority to force us to register our guns with them will prevent weapons from getting into the "wrong people’s" hands, and will somehow make the world a safer place. For whom might it be safer? The easy answer is criminals.
In reality, government is the real problem. Case in point: That little scandal affectionately codenamed "Fast and Furious," wherein the Justice Department made the injudicious decision to sell weapons to those linked to the Mexican drug cartel in Arizona. Their plan backfired when the weapons "walked" across the border into Mexico and into the hands of cartel thugs. It should have been codenamed "Dumb and Dumber." And more than 50 million Americans voted to give them a second term.
The United Nations needs to mind its own business and stay out of ours, thank you. And President Obama needs to get over his attitude about those who, as he once put it, are bitter because they "cling to guns or religion." Before he came along, we had the Constitution, need I say more? It doesn’t take a rocket scientist, or even this blond columnist, to deduce that if the U.N. is given an open door into our personal lives by way of the ATT, gun confiscations will, at some point, follow.
Susan Stamper Brown is an opinion page columnist, motivational speaker and military advocate who writes about politics, the military, the economy and culture. Email Susan at email@example.com or her website at susanstamperbrown.com. Her column is distributed exclusively by Cagle Cartoons Inc. newspaper syndicate.
TALK TO US
If you'd like to leave a comment (or a tip or a question) about this story with the editors, please email us. We also welcome letters to the editor for publication; you can do that by filling out our letters form and submitting it to the newsroom.